Since my thoughts on this topic seem to keep coming to me at 5:30 on Saturday mornings for some reason, and since I can't jinx a dog that's already gone by writing at this hour, I figure I'll take one last last crack at the final issue that's still eating at me.
I've spent a little more time this week reading what's being written about all of this on blogs and in some of the forums from people outside the music business. I would say that most people don't care. Fine. We're not talking to you. Of those that do, many people seem to get it and generally agree with where we're coming from. A fair summary of the arguments of those opposed would be something along these lines:
- Who are you to tell me I shouldn't buy stuff for $7.99? How dare you!
- You're just mad you don't get to tell us what we can and can't buy any more.
- Records are too expensive.
- Record stores suck.
- Record stores are stupid.
- I couldn't be bothered to read everything everybody wrote because it was so long with so many words but I still have an opinion and this here internet connection God gave me and I'm going to use it.
First, we're not here to tell anybody where they have to shop. We can suggest that there are long and short term benefits attached to where you do shop. And we can also suggest that the sale price point for the indie titles at BB was also a consumer imperative of where you had to buy those albums for the two weeks they were on sale at that price. That's about half of the point of my original open letter. Please keep in mind that my letter was initially written to other people in the music business. Because we're all in the business of music, it would then make sense that we'd all like to see that business continue along in as healthy a manner as we can all muster. We're very protective of it. It's what we do-what many of us have given our life to doing.
So if you really don't care about it, that's fine and dandy, but why have you read this far? Go somewhere else entertaining.
I suppose the next step up the ladder from not caring, is caring about the music, but not the way it gets to you. That's fine too. I don't know the cow that gave me my milk. I wish I did because I really loved Elsie when I was a little kid, but the fact is that life's SO fast and complicated these days that we all have to pick and choose our battles.
Obviously for those of us in various parts of the business of bringing you music, we care deeply about how that gets done and we'd all like for it to be as efficiently and cheaply as possible in a method that will continue to support itself for years to come. I believe we all realize that nothing is static except your clothes on a winter day in Chicago and we struggle constantly to figure out the next right move to make buying music as pleasant and easy as possible. It's also a really cool and I think unique aspect of this business that so many music fans actually DO care about where their music comes from. They have their favorite labels and stores, and the DIY ethic that has grown up from the early SST, Touch and Go, and Dischord days is still fairly strong and shared by fans and industry nerds alike.
If you read and understand my argument that this sale could be the tip of a very ugly iceberg, then we all need to talk about it and think about it and at least be aware of possible consequences going forward. The committed music fan is already doing a lot of their shopping at indies. We applaud you. And if the music fan who wasn't aware of where her milk came from suddenly has her consciousness raised a bit and changes her buying habits to support the stores who support the indie labels, then we may have gotten a net gain out of this and that would be cool and almost as pleasantly surprising as making that right turn light at Diversey and California.
And if you love music but either hate record stores or find them irrelevant, well then I guess I feel exceedingly sorry for you. Somehow part of the argument turned to the stereotypical Surly Record Store Clerk as the source of all of our problems. Crappy service in any business leads to a bad experience for the customer who may never come back. I've experienced that and back in my retail days I unfortunately probably unintentionally dished some of it out on a bad day in a store famous for bad attitude (which I actually almost never saw once our resident coke head checked out). In my experience, for every Barry, there are four or five Robs and Dicks who are just dying to tell you what they know and share with you the next Belle and Sebastian or old Jesus and Mary Chain LP. Indie record stores and small clubs act as incubators for little bands long before they get to a level where BB or Borders or VW are interested in them. I think we're way, way past them, or me, or us, being able to act as a "gatekeeper" for music. There's an enormous gulf between Gatekeeper/Protector of the Sacred Realm and indie record store's selling, supporting and nurturing music.
I promise you that no one, not even the owners of the largest indie shops, much less their floor clerks, are getting rich off of this endeavor. Not the indie label owners and certainly not the distributors and their 14% margin. If we can make a little money, that's nice. Most of the music retail people I know are more concerned that they and their coworkers make enough to just keep paying the business and personal rent, health insurance, light bill and taxes while they do their best to make as broad a spectrum of good music available to their customers in as welcoming an environment as possible.
The days of the stupid record store owner are long gone. If a store is open right now, I guarantee that the owner and their management team spend just about every waking moment figuring out what else they can do to get people in the door and provide them with stuff they want, from music to dvds and lifestyle products. To argue that they're too stupid to change means that you haven't been in a record store in a long time. They have and they are. But the crux of what they, and we, do is SELL MUSIC. The only reason that most of us got into this in the first place is because we love music. We spend much too large of a percentage of our paychecks on it just so we can have more of it with us even when we leave work where we've been around it all day. We live it and breathe it and think about it and have it around us just about every waking moment, even during Grey's Anatomy (which has terrific and frequently daring soundtrack choices, imho).
So if you say to record stores, "Adapt or die," I say they're doing that every day or else they wouldn't be in business, and if you'd been in one lately you'd already know that. But if your idea of adapting is expecting them to turn into a home electronics store, video game palace or nail salon, or perish, I think most stores would instead close up shop and hit eBay or the beach. And when something comes along that strikes at the core of what they/we do, perhaps damaging it irretrievably, then part of our adapting damned well better be to think through the ramifications very carefully. Make no mistake, Best Buy has the muscle and market penetration to force even the most progressive, well-adapted record stores out of business. Again, I don't necessarily think this is their goal, but I don't think they really care either.
And if you think the labels involved in the original $35,000 (as reported by Billboard) coop deal, the ones that bring you the music that you care enough about to read Pitchfork in the first place, don't think that the continued existence of indie retail is important, than you didn't read past my posts. READ THE COMMENTS and see for yourself in their own words.
On an upbeat note, the hip teens with whom I am in contact are buying vinyl. Yes, VINYL. You can't download that. And at least for now, you can't buy it in a chain store. Signs of hope are few but happy when stumpled upon.
The last thought of my last last thought is that we are sad we have not heard from any of the musicians involved. When people in Madagascar and the Baltic Republics are reading about this, I find it difficult to believe that none of the artists have seen it. I wish some of them had taken the time to comment on it somewhere, because in the end it's their art for sale and most likely at least 50% of their co-op ad to pay for.
Hopefully the next time you hear from us in this space, we'll be talking about our new, baby webstore, the bugs we're trying to squash out of it, and the records we love most that are offered on it. You know. Music (and commerce).
oh god, not the danny miller blog. over at viachicago.org, the wilco message board, people go gaga over his blog. mostly just because they feel they can get a "non-stalkerish" glimpse into someone closely related to jeff tweedy.
ReplyDeletenice reporting on the whole issue. unfortunately, i am unable to purchase as much music as i used to, due to having a kid, but i would rather spend 15 bucks in an "indie" record store, and maybe have a little conversation with the guy behind the counter, then being asked if i want a free trail to entertainment weekly/sports illustrated when i make my music purchase.
"I'm not a capitalist, but I know how capitalism works"....oh master, thank you for coming down off the mountain and judging before teaching us from your sacred wellspring. Pretentous hoo haw...the usual capitalism is evil and you get what ya deserve hook.Yes,
ReplyDeleteThe systsem allows for this type of scenario (we are still talking about best buy, no?), but it's what the people do w/the system, and so it boils down to the company or individuals and how they work w/the capitalist system we find ourselves immersed in.
That Fall b-sides cd for $17 was probably sold to the store for $12--$13 btw...and mark e. smith probably sold the same master tapes to two different companies to pocket each one's advance. Does that make Mark E. Smith evil, or the system?
Most Dischord catalog titles are sold to retail at $7 (which at my store means they're priced at $10.99) with some newer titles at $7.50-$8.50 ($11.99-$12.99)
ReplyDeleteI obviously can't speak for all stores, but here all prices are determined by the same ratio to cost (which really sucks when AEC expects you to sell a $10.79 CD for $13.99)
I hate to say this, mainly because it seems painfully obvious, but the problem here is not the sociopathic chainstores that stalk any dollar they can get, or the labels who are trying to find a way to make back their money and pay the bands (i'm talking about ethical indie's here, not the big 4), or capitalism (in which there's no inherent evil); the problem is in people.
ReplyDeleteIf you care about the music you listen to, make sure the artists are compensated.
It is not helpful to a community to shut those channels down because your craving exceeds your ability to support them (ie: the i want the music, but i only have $xx.xx a month to spend).
I am disappointed in the labels that sell their records in chain stores, and I am also disappointed that bands allow their records to be sold by chain stores.
They should know what kind of community support will yield longevity, and they're not going to get it from appliance outlets.
This is not snobbery. It's communtiy building. Each kind of music, aside from abstract arguments of what it SHOULD cost, or who SHOULD have access to it, does not appeal to everyone. It cannot be all things to all people.
Find the channels that will get it in front of those who will appreciate it, and will be promoted in a way that will engender that community. Build it from there.
Please.
I can see why people thought they might be able to sell more copies in chain stores.
Obviously this short term grab has yielded a long term fissure in the ass of independent music (if i can use that adjective in this context).
Time to go back to the basics.
You've done a great thing with this blog.
Thanks for getting this stuff up for discussion.
The anti-corporate armband mafia is getting a bit stale. This argument has been going on for the past 10 years or more. Indie stores died off. Indie stores survived. The artists are not starving any more if their albums are sold at BB or an indie store. The prescient point is that it is a matter of economics.
ReplyDeleteBB took a short term loss on pricing to generate revenue through moving quantity and get foot traffic into the building. This has been a long-time retail tactic. Look at where your pharmacy counter is in a pharmacy store: 9 times out of ten, it is in the back where you have to walk past a bunch of crap you don't need.
BB doesn't care about indie stores as competition. Their pricing serves their own purpose because they know the competition is generally a small mom and pop shop. Indie stores aren't much competition for the price conscious buyer who has a BB next to them. Those who find value in an indie shop get what they want from an indie shop. Those who want the lowest price possible will go to the chain store.
That being said, in the short term, it may impact the small indie shop. But in the long term, as pointed out in the story linked about the BB and CDBaby deal, BB realized their employees were sending buyers to the small shops and independent dealers. Obviously no one seems to be complaining about the referrals sent from the chain stores to the indies. Labels are smart about this and they know this happens. Having an indie store carry a bigger backstock at full prices serves as an advantage. A label may get the newest release of their hot artist into the hands of a buyer at X dollars but that is irrelevant - if the buyer is hooked on the band, guess where they have to go for more? Usually this is somewhere where they buy at full retail.
In the end run, yeah maybe the labels were selling their albums for insanely low prices, but in the end, it pays off for the label, the artist and the distributor.